Cogent Training

25-27 EBR - Formal Argumentation - Missing

• Introduction to EBR and Cogent
• Evidence-Based Reasoning Training
  • Evidence-Based Reasoning Concepts
    • 01-02 EBR - Connecting the Dots
    • 03-04 EBR - Questions and Hypotheses
    • 05 EBR - Argumentation Evidence and Assumptions
    • 06 EBR - Evidence Credibility and Fact
    • 07 EBR - Relevance of Evidence
    • 08 EBR - Inferential Force of Evidence
    • 09 EBR - Evidence-based Reasoning Overview
  • Evidence-Based Reasoning Strategies
    • 10-11 EBR - Strategy for Building the Argumentation
    • 12 EBR - Basis for Hypothesis
    • 13 EBR - Probability Scale
    • 14-15 EBR - Simple Argument
    • 16-17 EBR - Alternative Arguments
    • 18-19 EBR - AND Argument
    • 20-21 EBR - On Balance and Negation
  • Missing Cesium Analysis
    • 22 EBR - Missing Cesium Problem
    • 23-24 EBR - Informal Argumentation
    • 25-27 EBR - Formal Argumentation - Missing
    • 28 EBR - Credibility Assessment Guidance
    • 29 EBR - Acknowledgements
• Getting Started with Cogent
  • Download and Setup Cogent
  • Open and Close Cogent and Analyses
  • Introduction to Getting Started with Cogent
  • Hands on: Getting Started with Cogent
• Cogent Operations Help
  • Introduction to Operations Help
  • Hands on: Operations Help
• Report Development Training
  • Report Development Training
• Report Help
  • Introduction to Report Help
  • Hands on: Report Help
• Cogent Online Help
  • Cogent Online Help
• Cogent Practice
  • Create a New Analysis
  Economics Minister Fired
  • Hands On
  • Explained Solution
  • Entrance Exam
    • Hands On
    • Explained Solution
  • Stolen Car
    • Hands On
    • Explained Solution - Part 1
    • Explained Solution - Part 2
  • Salazar
    • Hands on
    • Explained Solution
  • SAM Sale
    • Hands On
    • Explained Solution
• Additional EBR Training
  • Analysis of Alternative Hypotheses
    • 33-36 EBR - Extended Cesium Investigation
    • 37 EBR - Argumentation Development for Stolen Cesium
    • 38 EBR - Testimonial Evidence and its Credibility
    • 39 EBR - Tangible Evidence and its Credibility
    • 40 EBR - Mixed Evidence and its Credibility
    • 41-42 EBR - Assumptions
    • 43 EBR - Completed Argumentation for Stolen Cesium
    • 44 EBR - Completed Argumentation for Cesium Used in Project
    • 45 EBR - Completed Argumentation for Missing Cesium
  • Adjustment of the Analysis
    • 46-48 EBR - Finalized Analysis
    • 49 EBR - Types of Evidence
  • Introduction to Evidence-Based Reasoning with Cogent
• Additional Report Development Training
  • Report Development with Cogent
    • 01 Rep - Training Overview
    • 02 Rep - Report Development Overview
    • 03 Rep - Report Editing Overview
    • 04 Rep - Adding Argumentation Fragments and Evidence to the Report
    • 05 Rep - Production Report
  • Editing Single-Hypothesis Report
    • 06 Rep - Writing the Report’s Answer
    • 07 Rep - Structure of the First Paragraph in the Stolen Car Problem
    • 08 Rep - Structure of Follow-on Paragraphs in the Stolen Car Problem
    • 09 Rep - Structure of the Direct Evidence Paragraph in the Stolen Car Problem
  • Multiple-Hypotheses Report
    • 10 Rep - Report Development for Multiple Hypotheses
    • 11 Rep - Basic Report Structure for Multiple Hypotheses
    • 12 Rep - Editing the Summary Paragraph in the Cesium Problem
    • 13 Rep - Developing the First Paragraph after the Summary in the Cesium Problem
    • 14 Rep - Developing the Second Paragraph in the Cesium Problem
    • 15 Rep - Answer when both the Hypothesis and its Negation Lack Support
    • 16 Rep - Developing the Third Paragraph in the Cesium Problem
  • Evidence in Report
    • 17 Rep - Overview 4
    • 18 Rep - How Many Alternative Evidence Items to Include in the Report
    • 19 Rep - How Many Evidence Items of an AND Argument to Include in the Report
    • 20 Rep - Citing Sources in the Production Report
  • Paragraph Structure for Single-Hypothesis Report
    • 21 Rep - Paragraph Structure - Reports with a Single Hypothesis
    • 22 Rep - Paragraph Structure - Sub-reasons For and Against with No Disfavoring Arguments
    • 23 Rep - Paragraph Structure - Sub-reasons For and Against with Favoring and Disfavoring Arguments
    • 24 Rep - Paragraph structure - There are only Sub-reasons For and they Lack Support
    • 25 Rep - Summary - Reports with a Single Hypothesis
  • Paragraph Structure for Multiple-Hypotheses Report
    • 26 Rep - Paragraph Structure - Reports with Multiple Hypothesis
    • 27 Rep - Writing the Bottom Line For Hypothesis - BLFH
    • 28 Rep - Paragraph Structure - There are only Reasons For the Hypothesis
    • 29 Rep - Paragraph Structure - Reasons For but some with Disfavoring Arguments
    • 30 Rep - Paragraph Structure - Reasons For and Against with Inferential Force
    • 31 Rep - Paragraph Structure - Reasons Against Lack Support
    • 32 Rep - When to Use Multiple Paragraphs for a Hypothesis
    • 33 Rep - Summary - Reports with Multiple Hypotheses
    • 34 Rep - Acknowledgements